Derma Wand vs Nuface Microcurrent – Which Should You Go With?  

Microcurrent technology delivers low level electricity to the body by reflecting the body’s natural electrical currents to induce chemical reactions in the cells. These reactions are claimed to accelerate blood circulations as well as production of collagen and elastin. Through this process, the skin achieves firmness and reduced wrinkle appearance.

Derma Wand and Nuface Microcurrent are both innovations that employ microcurrent technology to promote anti-aging benefits. While they achieve similar results, these two brands have differences that we address here.

Read on to get the detailed comparative review of the two products to help you pick the best product.


What is Derma Wand? What is Nuface Microcurrent?

Derma Wand is a device that has been clinically proven to reduce fine lines and wrinkles, firm saggy skin, reduce pore size, even skin texture, reduce under eye puffiness, and plumps lips.


Nuface Microcurrent is also a non-invasive device designed to provide facial rejuvenation. It is claimed to tone facial features, reduce the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles around the forehead, eyes, and mouth.


Derma Wand Ingredients Nuface Microcurrent Ingredients
·         None ·         None
How Derma Wand Works How Nuface Microcurrent Works

Derma Wand is a condensed version of the high frequency machines found in commercial skincare establishments. It delivers low-level microcurrent impulses of about 168,000 cycles per second. It has projections that emulate fingers to massage the skin, improving circulation of oxygen and nutrition to the skin.


Nuface Microcurrent works to reenergize the skin’s natural current to slow down aging. The energy boost the skin receives penetrates the skin surface to address signs of aging both instantly and long term. This device helps to improve the appearance of sagging and crepey skin, defines facial features, and smooths fine lines and wrinkles.


The Advantages of Derma Wand The Advantages of Nuface Microcurrent
  • May reduce fine lines, wrinkles and enlarged spores
  • May reduce skin sagginess and help the skin become more lifted, toned, and tightened
  • May enhance even skin texture
  • May rejuvenate the skin by oxygenating the surface
  • Quite affordable
  • May promote facial rejuvenation and youthful appearance
  • May help firm facial skin and reduce puffiness
  • Claims to be recommended by skin care professionals
  • Has a smart design for easy use
  • Comes with a charging cradle to keep the device on
The Disadvantages of Derma Wand The Disadvantages of Nuface Microcurrent

  • The bulb on the device is not covered by the manufacturer warranty


  •  Quite expensive
Summary About Derma Wand Summary About Nuface Microcurrent

Derma Wand is a microcurrent device that stimulates blood, oxygen, and nutrition circulation in the skin. It can be used on the face, neck, chest, arms, hips, thighs, buttocks and legs. This device works to improve fine lines and wrinkles, reduces enlarged pores, evens skin texture, and plumps the lips.


Nuface Microcurrent is an advanced skincare tool that provides facial rejuvenation. This at-home microcurrent device targets fine lines, wrinkles, puffiness, and loss of elasticity. By sending microcurrent to the skin surface, it stimulates the muscles underneath to provide the face a sculpted appearance.



Both Derma Wand and Nuface Microcurrent mimic professional electric muscle stimulation. They send low-level microcurrent to the skin layers to prompt circulation that improve muscle alignment.

Though expensive, the Nuface Microcurrent has better reviews compared to Derma Wand. On Amazon for instance, the Nuface Trinity Facial Toning Device ($339.00) has a rating of 4.3 stars. In addition, this product bagged Allure’s Best of Beauty Award 2020, making it a great choice.

Unfortunately, not everyone can splurge hundreds of dollars to get the Nuface Microcurrent device and that’s where DermaWand comes in. At $109.99, this device can give you similar results if used consistently. It is backed by a one-year money-back guarantee, meaning you can shop risk free.

For users targeting aging signs in areas other than the face, the Derma Wand is the device to go for. This is because it can be used on the face, chest, arms, hips, buttocks and legs, which is not the case with Nuface Microcurrent as it only targets facial rejuvenation. Nuface has a separate device for body toning called the Nuface NuBody Skin Toning Device.

According to dermatologists, at-home microcurrent devices are best used for prevention and rejuvenation purposes as they cannot replace in-office procedures or surgeries. At best, one can use either of these devices to improve the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles or firm slightly sagging skin.

Therefore, if you are looking to tone already saggy skin or correct coarse wrinkles, microcurrent technology will not do much. In this case, you will need to go for more serious procedures such as a facial lift to get the work done.

That said, our best pick between these two products is the Nuface Microcurrent as it is well reviewed by both specialists and consumers. Reviewers claimed that their face looked sculpted and cheekbones lifted. If you can get a device that can add to your skincare routine and help you look fresh and rejuvenated, what more can you ask for?



Asghar Rezasoltani, Fatemeh Saniee, Khosro Khademi, and Parviz Yazdanpanah. Pars of Jahrom University of Medical Sciences. “The effect of microcurrents on facial wrinkles” DOI: 10.29252/jmj.10.2.9

Eleftherios Karatzanos et al. Critical Care Research and Practice. 2012. “Electrical muscle stimulation: An effective form of exercise and early mobilization to preserve muscle strength in critically ill patients” PMID: 22545212

Anne Bauso and Leah Prinzivalli. Allure. 2020. “What are at-home microcurrent devices, and are they worth the splurge?”

Be the first to comment

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.